We think Remix's abstractions lead to better application code.Next.js requires you to change your application architecture and sacrifice performance when your data scales.Next.js build times increase linearly with your data, Remix build times are nearly instant and decoupled from data.Next.js requires client side JavaScript for data mutations, Remix doesn't.Next.js encourages client side JavaScript for serving dynamic content, Remix doesn't.Remix automatically handles errors, interruptions, and race conditions, Next.js doesn't.Remix enables fast user experiences even on slow networks.Remix is faster than Next.js at serving dynamic content.
Remix is as fast or faster than Next.js at serving static content.By the end, hopefully you'll consider Remix for your next project (no pun intended 😂). There is a lot of nuance in this conversation that's left un-captured in the shiny graphs and animations. We encourage you to read this entire article. They are doing great work and we respect the work they do!īut make no mistake, we think Remix has a better set of tradeoffs than Next.js. We've been friends with folks at Vercel long before Vercel was founded. If you're a fan of Remix and want to start tweeting smug reactions to this article, we kindly ask that you drop the smugness before hitting the tweet button 🤗. It appears we have to answer this question! We'd like to address it directly and without drama. Easily the biggest question we get asked is something like:
0 kommentar(er)
